Comments on: Subwoofer Origami https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/ The enthusiast's audio webzine Wed, 06 Mar 2024 19:37:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25 By: GERRIT GOVAERTS https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-112711 Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:20:26 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-112711 An H-frame wich is much wider than the diameter of the woofer (say twice) must have a dipole distance D much higher than its total depth . Logic dictates this as other wise an I-frame would have a D equal to the thickness of the baffle

]]>
By: John Reekie https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-112599 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:47:18 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-112599 Hi, the nulls are roughly to the sides in all cases with the listener “underneath” the diagram. I think your suggestion will have a small effect on the bass response but only small.

]]>
By: Randy https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-112598 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:16:17 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-112598 Hi. Thanks for this article.

I was wondering if you knew the effects on the N-frame subwoofer if one were to lengthen one of the sides of the subwoofer to the rear. In your diagram, I would be referring to the upper left side. I was thinking that while the front and rear won’t be totally symmetrical, the added ‘wing’ might take advantage of some of the ‘dead’ space behind the speaker and cut down a bit more on the open baffle cancellation without providing quite the resonance of a U frame in the rear. Also, what is the radiation pattern of the N frame? Is it from the ‘mouth’ of the ‘N’ or is it along the plane of the driver? I hope these questions make sense. Thanks

x
x
x
x x x
x x x
x x x
x x

]]>
By: John Reekie https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-112516 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:35:40 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-112516 Hi Anshari, you would have to build a prototype and measure it, but I would use a W-frame, and try some “slot-loading” depending on the driver’s Fs and Q.

]]>
By: Anshari Anno https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-112509 Thu, 02 Nov 2017 04:26:39 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-112509 Hi John,

Can you advise which design will be the best option for dual 21″ subwoofer with xo point less than 80Hz 24dB?

Thanks

]]>
By: John Reekie https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-2575 Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:23:47 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-2575 Hi Johnson, would you be able to provide a link to those measurements? Thank you!

]]>
By: Johnson https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-2572 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:52:04 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-2572 Published measurements for Ripoles show significantly different data at low SPL vs. high SPL. An equation for minimum W-W separation based upon woofer construction is necessary. .

]]>
By: Lucian https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-1551 Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:13:31 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-1551 thank you for your very contentfull and easy to understand explications. It was the missing link i needed to build my best subwoofers. Ripol rules .

Lucian

]]>
By: Sean https://www.hifizine.com/2012/12/subwoofer-origami/comment-page-1/#comment-1549 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:13:01 +0000 http://www.hifizine.com/?p=4056#comment-1549 Thanks for this article John. This is really helpful to us DIY types. Photos of industry examples next to the diagrams would a useful addition.

]]>